What area of studies might require expedited review?

Expedited review is typically applicable to research that poses minimal risk to participants compared to full review procedures. Non-invasive procedures are generally considered low-risk because they do not involve physical or psychological harm, significantly easing the ethical concerns associated with them. Research in this area, such as studies using surveys or observational methods that do not expose participants to harmful interventions, often meets the criteria for expedited review due to the reduced level of impact on participants' well-being and the relatively straightforward nature of the research process.

In contrast, clinical trials involving high-risk interventions tend to require more rigorous review processes due to the potential for significant harm. Likewise, surveys that may introduce significant bias or literature reviews that involve data collection often demand a more thorough examination, as they can also raise ethical implications or methodological concerns that necessitate careful oversight. Therefore, studies involving non-invasive procedures are most aligned with the criteria for expedited review, conducive to a faster evaluation process.