What criteria must be evaluated for research applications involving human subjects?

The evaluation of research applications involving human subjects necessitates a thorough assessment of the risks associated with the study and the adequacy of protections put in place to mitigate these risks. This criterion is fundamental to ensuring ethical standards in research, as articulated in the Belmont Report. The report emphasizes the principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice, which necessitate that researchers identify potential risks to participants and implement appropriate safeguards.

By focusing on risks and protections, the evaluation process seeks to ensure that the rights and welfare of participants are prioritized, that informed consent is obtained, and that there are ongoing measures to minimize harm throughout the study. This vigilance is crucial in maintaining ethical integrity in research involving human subjects, ultimately fostering trust and accountability in the research process.

Other criteria mentioned, such as availability of funding, letters of recommendation, or the prospect of publication, are important in their own contexts but do not directly address ethical considerations in the evaluation of research that involves human subjects. Therefore, they do not fulfill the essential criteria as outlined in the Belmont Report.