When assessing the risk of harm, what must researchers ensure?

Prepare for the Belmont Report ME Exam. Study with expert-crafted flashcards and multiple choice questions. Gain clarity with detailed hints and explanations for each question. Ace your exam with confidence!

The correct answer emphasizes the importance of relying on prior research to inform estimates of potential harm in a study. When researchers assess risks, it is crucial for them to have a well-founded understanding of what those risks may entail. Drawing from previous studies allows researchers to identify known risks, understand their relative likelihood, and gauge the severity of potential harms. This evidence-based approach can lead to more accurate risk assessments and contribute to better research design, ultimately enhancing participant safety and ethical standards in research.

Prior empirical evidence provides a benchmark for researchers, enabling them to anticipate challenges and mitigate risks effectively. By grounding their assessments in existing literature, researchers can also demonstrate a commitment to ethical considerations in research, adhering to the principles outlined in the Belmont Report.

In contrast, attempting to eliminate all risks entirely is often unrealistic in research settings, as some level of risk is typically inherent in many studies. Moreover, subjects must be properly informed about risks rather than lacking understanding, which is vital for informed consent. Lastly, while considering the potential benefits in relation to the risks is essential in ethical research practices, the specific expectation to ensure that benefits justify risks does not directly pertain to the assessment of the risk of harm itself. Instead, it is a part of the broader ethical evaluation of the

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy